6.2.13

Cultural Studies

Lanjutan dari postingan sebelumnya. Writing yang kedua ini tugas akhir matkul cultural studies. Di matkul ini kita belajar budaya Jepang zaman dulu dari segi literaturnya. Contohnya kita menganalisis Tale of Genji, cerita yang menurutku lumayan bejat *sebenernya ada yang lebih bejat lagi, menjijikkan pokoknya* dan sadar kenapa Jepang punya produksi film/buku/komik porno yang lumayan tinggi di dunia karena ternyata sejak zaman dulu isi cerita dari literatur mereka ya mepet-mepet sama yang beginian. Memang nggak semua kayak gitu sih tapi kayaknya banyak yang temanya model gini.
Di writing ini aku ngambil topik tentang giri dari cerita Chusingura.


Loyalty Based on Chûshingura Story and Islamic Values
Kanadehon Chûshingura (The Treasury of Loyal Retainers), popularly known as Chûshingura, is a Japanese puppet play (bunraku [文楽] or ningyō jōruri [人形浄瑠璃] ) written by Takeda Izumo II, Miyoshi Shôraku, and Namiki Sôsuke in 1748 . The story is mainly about loyalty and revenge story, based upon events that occurred at the beginning of the eighteenth century. At Edo Castle, Asano Naganori, the lord of Ako (now part of Hyogo Prefecture), drew his sword against Kira Yoshinaka, the shogun's chief of protocol. The shogun immediately ordered Asano to commit suicide and omitted Asano's domain. Because of  that, about 300 retainers suddenly found themselves out of a job. But, this incident did not mean the end of their loyalty to Asano. In December of the following year, 47 of the masterless samurai, led by Oishi Kuranosuke, avenged the death of their lord by slaying Kira. The men then gave themselves up to the shogunate, and a few weeks later were ordered to commit suicide. This story then was adapted into bunraku which Ko no Moronô represents Kira Yoshinaka, Enya Hangan Takasada represents Asano Naganori and Oboshi Yuranosuke represents Oishi Kuranosuke.
What makes this story really popular is that Japanese audiences admire the characteristic of giri that is shown by the retainers to their masters.  Giri, or loyalty, is the principal ethic of  bushido (the way of the warrior). According to Ruth Benedict in her book “The Chrysanthemum and the Sword: Patterns of Japanese Culture”, giri has many meanings : forcing someone to take revenge and to commit suicide in order to purify his name, killing himself, his family, and his life for the sake of honor, self-control, self-esteem, loyal and willing to die for the sake of his master. The idea of Chûshingura focuses on the last meaning, loyalty to the master even the master already died. “Griffis was quiet right in stating that whereas in China Confucian ethics made obedience to parents the primary human duty, in Japan precedence was given to loyalty…,” (Nitobe,83). Concept of giri was also introduced by Yamaga Soko in some of his books dealing with "the warrior’s creed" (bukyō) and "the way of the gentleman" (shidō). According to review by Columbia University’s scholar, Yamaga Soko emphasizes that devotion to duty as the most important aspect of a samurai’s life and believed that the samurai class should assume moral leadership in society.
Here, the writer picks up three names among all characters which are appeared in Chûshingura to be evaluated. They are Kakogawa Honzo Yukikuni, Wakanosuke’s chief retainer ; Hayano Kampei, Enya’s retainer; and Oboshi Yuranosuke, Enya’s chief retainer.
Firstly, let us evaluate Kakogawa Honzo Yukikuni who is Wakanosuke’s chief retainer. Wakanosuke told Honzo that he wanted to kill Moronô and asked Honzo not to do anything to stop his plan. Honzo just said that he really supported Wakanosuke’s idea. However, as soon as Wakanosuke departs, Honzô disobeys his master and rushes to Moronô’s mansion to arrange for an apology from Moronô. He bribed Moronô in order to avoid any incidents which might occur later on such as the enforced suicide of Wakasanosuke and the confiscation of all his assets. In the writer’s point of view, Honzo is not a loyal samurai because his action, bribing someone, does not reflect moral values that samurai should have. Samurai has  many honorable values which are held in his daily life  and bribing is not one of them. Actually Honzo’s purpose is good because he just wanted to protect his master. But if he is really loyal to his master, he would respect Wakanosuke’s decision, obey his master’s words, and take the consequences of his master’s action. Is not bribing the same as lying to his master?
How about Hayano Kampei, one of Enya’s retainer? At first he wished to kill himself by way of apology for neglecting his duty to dally with Okaru begged him to go her home together and Kampei finally agreed because he was really ashamed for not being able to protect his master. In fact, we often see this kind of behavior in daily life for instance some Japanese prime ministers resigned before his tenure runs out  because he felt he was incompetent to do the duty as a good prime minister  and may be this is one of values held by  Japanese people  demonstrate their responsibility. But, the writer thinks this action is not the right way to show loyalty. If Kampei was really loyal then at least he would choose to stay beside his master even after he did wrong. Even though in the end he was happy because he  managed to have his name included among along with the other retainers involved in the vendetta before he died,  it would be better if since beginning he could pay his mistake by supporting Enya Hangan and not even once leaving him.
The last character here is Oboshi Yuranosuke, Enya’s chief retainer, which is the leader of the vendetta. This character demonstrate the real meaning of giri or loyalty. Because since beginning,  he maintained his master’s dying wish to be avenged on Moronô and he tried by all means such as gathering other retainers and arranging strategy in order to complete that mission. He even left his wife and his son in order to be concentrate in his duty.  His choice waiting for almost two years and spending time in the pleasure quarters before killing Ko no Moronô is a smart way to disguise the actual mission. He just prepared well the whole plans so that in the day everything went perfectly.  It was a pride for him after killing Moronô and placing the head of Moronô at the Enya’s grave even he knew that he had to commit seppuku after doing all of these.
The ethic of giri or loyalty can be found also in Islamic values. Walaa’ (loyalty, allegiance) is amongst the key concepts of the Islamic aqeedah which every Muslim must understand and hold close to their hearts. In essence it means the loyalty to Allah, to His Messenger and to the believers. As samurai’s loyalty to his master, His Messenger,Prophet Muhammad, also have many companions who are very faithful, loyal, and sincere to him. For instance is the story below which shows how loyal  His companion to Him. One day the holy Prophet was saying His prayers in the Kaba. Abu Jahl and some other chiefs of Makkah were sitting in the courtyard of the Kaba. “I must finish with Muhammad today,” said Abu Jahl. So saying, he took a long piece of cloth. He put it around the holy Prophet’s neck then twisted it hard. Abu Bakr, one of His companion, happened to see this from a distance. He at once ran to the help of the Prophet. Thereupon Abu Jahl and the other enemies of Islam beat Abu Bakr very badly. He did not regain his sense for several hours. And when he did come to himself, the first question he asked was, “Is the Prophet well?” Abu Bakr did not care about his own suffering. He was glad that he was able to save the Prophet’s life.
From the story above, we know that the companion is really loyal to Prophet Muhammad. He even did not ignore his condition because no matter how he should protect the Prophet and he was willing to die for Him. Even after Prophet Muhammad died, His companions still held His words and continued spreading His message. So actually,  giri and walaa’ share quite similar value, that is loyal to your master. This loyalty remains forever even the master already died and it could be demonstrated in various ways in form of protecting the master or maintaning and applying the master’s values throughout his life. The main difference between these two ethics probably is that in walaa’, there is no revenge or suicide to purify either your name or your master’s name.

References:
Benedict,Ruth.1967. The Chrysanthemum And the Sword: Patterns of Japanese Culture.Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Nitobe, Inazo. 2007. Bushido:The Soul of Japan. Minneapolis: Filiquarian Publishing LLC.


No comments:

Post a Comment